The Blockbuster as the Defining Characteristic of Post-Classical Essay

The Blockbuster as the Defining Characteristic of Post-Classical Hollywood - judge ExampleBordwell (2006) explains that smash hit is lots used not to denote a genre of film per se but to describe the performance of a motion-picture show on the market. In simple terms, blockbuster is often associated with take a shit or good movies that generate a lot of revenue for filmmakers. One would then bring whether in the pre-blockbuster era there were no good movies. The answer is no. there were good and hit movies but after movies like Jaws started showing the possibility of amassing so many profits from the box office, the revolve around of filmmakers now shifted to finding the trick of fashioning huge box offices in each and every movie they make and that started the blockbuster era. So in general terms, the generator agrees that blockbuster came to take off as the defining device characteristic of post-classical Hollywood. However, the writer refuses to agree to the often negati ve connotation given to blockbuster as the defining characteristic of post-classical Hollywood. In the opinion of the writer, therefore, blockbusters came as a good and positive phenomenon and continue to tarry so. One of the first reasons why the writer disagrees with the argument that the blockbuster is a negative defining characteristic of post-classical Hollywood is that blockbuster actually came in to serve a dying situation. This is to say that the trend of the blockbuster was very important in saving the Hollywood film industry from absolute and total collapse. Clearly, nonstarter was taking over the film industry and so there was every justification for a mental process that would salvage the situation. Two clear examples can be given in the cases of Heavens Gate, which was produced in 1980 by Michael Cimino and One from the Heart, which was produced in 1982 by Francis Ford Coppola. Heavens Gate actually made a loss of 40.5million USD after earning $3.5 million in box-off ice as against a $44 million issue cost. One from the heart earned merely $636,000 out of $26 million. The said now that such large players behind the film industry actually run into bankruptcy since those losses. Without any doubt, the industry would have been staidly affected if the pursuit for profit-making through the production of hit films was not followed as what was earned in 1975 with the making of Jaws. On the grounds that blockbuster was necessary to rejuvenating the efforts of filmmakers to seek ways of producing films that were good enough to make them hinderance in the industry is thus a positive rather than a negative phenomenon of the blockbuster as the defining characteristic of post-classical Hollywood. It is even interesting to note that blockbusters do not necessarily have to be of good quality to make profits but there have been newer introductions such as engineering science backed publicity by the use of social and popular media to ensure that blockbuster s sell. The second point that makes the writer take a stand against the idea that blockbuster is a negative defining characteristic of post-classical Hollywood is that not much has changed in terms of concept.